Voreqe clutching at loose straws

Folks, more hollow rhetoric from the shameless & desperate Dictator Voreqe Baini-puaka. The people of Fiji and the international community look upon Voreqe, his military council and the interim govt rather pitifully.

After a quarter of a century at international peacekeeping duties, this is what it’s come down to – just a bunch of common criminals, but dressed in fatigues and armed to the teeth.

Fiji had NEVER in its history, needed saving by its military, on the contrary, it is this very institution that has, for the past 2 decades, perpetuated treason and domestic terrorism against its own people and their elected leaders.

No longer about legality : ILLEGAL Interim PM

F/Times, Sunday, October 05, 2008

Update: 2:12PM Interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama has made it clear that the work done by the interim regime now is not about legality or illegality but about building the nation. Speaking to a local radio station, Commodore Bainimarama was responding to statements made that the interim regime is illegal. Numerous calls have also been made by various people and political parties for the public not to support the interim governments efforts and work. Cmdr Bainimarama told Radio Fiji the nation needs to move forward and could not be held back by criticisms. He added the military is the only institution that protects all races and therefore is the only institution that can protect Fiji. “Fiji belongs to indigenous Fijians but it does not mean that we have the right to threaten and steal from other races who have called Fiji their home,” he said.

15 Responses to “Voreqe clutching at loose straws”

  1. Tuks Says:

    Voreqe,
    You have made a fool of yourself. You have deliberately lied to your own soldiers and have deliberately politicised the institution of Fiji’s once highly respected military and its institutions. You have brought shame to the military and the soldiers . All that we can see of you now are but a bunch of terrorists, highly professional criminals, law breakers and rebel soldiers to the highest order… Thats what you have all now become.
    Your above comment on radio confusing the legality or illegality factor of your Interim Government leadership are controversial. It is evidence of the destructive and sad situation you as leader have now put the military in. You have also made a complete turn around from your 2000 action against Speight and your stance then on the issue and respect of the Rule of Law. It is a shame. You have shamed yourself . Unfortunately all your soldiers must share the same due to their decision to follow along blindly. The Fiji Military have become a rebel and terrorist Force which we must be all ashame of . Shame! Shame..that’s what you are all about now!!

  2. Tim Says:

    If Frank still clings to his plan of weeding out corruption, making positive changes and “moving the country forward” this is an admission of defeat it ever there was one. How does such an admission fit with the likes of Yippe-I-Aye Khaiyum, the SHAMEen sisters and others in this iIG? I guess since they’re all such opportunists they’ll have no trouble coping with their hypocrisy, failure and consciences…….just keep the lollies rolling in!

  3. Tim Says:

    Incidently – isn’t around the date of a certain anniversary? i.e. the lifting of Frank’s state of emergency. I shouldn’t really give him ideas – he might try and conjour up another one since he’s about as original as a Chinese made Rolex

  4. jiko Says:

    what an ass-ole?

  5. Billy Says:

    Any attempt to abrogate will pile even worse treason charges on his thinning skull. Never has there been a time when the military has been fully exposed for all its crimes, sa qai kenai soqoni kece qo. We can only watch in anticipation as they destroy themselves silly!

  6. mediawatcher Says:

    Fiji SUN, 5 October 200*:

    Mahatma Gandhi’s message: stand up and fight for your voting rights in Fiji

    By VICTOR LAL

    On the night of 7 June 1993, one hundred years to the night when a 23-year-old young Indian lawyer Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was thrown out of the first-class whites only compartment of a South African train in Pietermaritzburg in Natal, because of his colour, I found history repeating itself. I was refused entry into a predominantly white frequented restaurant in Pietermaritzburg because of my colour. And it coincided on the day of my birthday, 7 June. The restaurant incident brought home to me the lingering power of race hatred and man’s inhumanity to man (not to mention woman’s inhumanity to woman).
    I had been invited by the University of Natal to deliver a keynote conference speech to the centenary anniversary of that historic train incident to an international group of “Gandhi scholars” gathered in Natal, and the title of my presentation was “South Africa: Gandhi’s baptism to Mahatmaship”.
    What I told the conference was lost to what happened to me, with the Natal Witness (which had been reporting on Gandhi since his first day in that British colony in 1893) carrying the banner headline: “Lesson from Gandhi: History Repeats Itself.” The incident was reported in all major South African newspapers, especially when the country was on the cusp of holding its first post-apartheid general election, which would later see Nelson Mandela become the President of South Africa.
    When questioned by the South African newspapers, I told them that it was a tragedy that some people in Pietermaritzburg have a habit of repeating history. “In this man’s (the restaurant manager) behaviour I could see the images of the train conductor who ejected Gandhi off the first class carriage at Pietermaritzburg railway station,” I told The Natal Witness, adding that the centenary celebrations had done little to educate people in the ways of non-racism, and reminded them of the Fijian version of apartheid that was in existence in Fiji following the 1987 coups.
    However, I assured the South African newspapers that I would not buckle from that sorry episode, for I had suffered other racist excesses in that country during periods of research on Gandhi. I assured them that I would continue to fight for human rights and justice for all the oppressed peoples of the world but pointed out that they would not find a statue of me outside the infamous restaurant, similar to a statute of Gandhi in Church Street, Pietermaritzburg, which was unveiled in our presence on 6 June 1993 by Archbishop Desmond Tutu. One inscription from Gandhi reads on the statute: “My life is my message.” And neither do I accept the label foisted upon me by the 2006 coup apologists in Fiji, who have been describing me as “Mahatma Lal”.
    After the conference I remained in South Africa to give further lectures on Gandhi’s South African period, and carried out further archival research for a series of Gandhi related projects that I had been working on for a number of years: The Rule of Law in the Making of the Mahatma: Gandhi as a human rights lawyer in South Africa, 1893-1914; The Indian Coolies: Gandhi’s Outcastes Within the British Empire, 1834-1920; Bittersweet Encounter: Gandhi and South African Jews; Gandhi and the Non-Conformist Baptists in South Africa; The Hindu Gandhi in South Africa; Gandhi as a Journalist and Publisher in South Africa; An Indian Nationalist or a Misguided Racist in South Africa: Gandhi and the Africans; and The Fateful Encounter: Henry Polak (A Jewish Idealist) and Mohandas Gandhi (An Indian Nationalist) in South Africa. The last is a full length biography of Polak who, with C. F. Andrews and A. D. Patel and others, fought for the rights of the Indians in Fiji.
    On 25 April 1997, Pietermaritzburg Local Council met on the railway platform and posthumously conferred upon the late Gandhi the Freedom of the City. Mahatma Gandhi’s grandson, Gopalkrishna, then India’s high commissioner to South Africa, in accepting the award, in the presence of Nelson Mandela, said: “Here in Pietermaritzburg today, here at this railway station the question may well be asked: Who was the man that was flung out; who was it that fell? Again, who was it that rose from his humiliation – somewhere here – on two very different feet? The question may be answered, thus: When Gandhi was evicted from the train, an Indian visiting South Africa fell; but when Gandhi rose an Indian South African rose. The Indian and the South African merged in him that instant he fell. Doubtless, with astonished disbelief. This must have turned, the very next instant, to fury. But in an alchemy that was uniquely his own, it turned also into something totally different, something creative, something redemptive, something that changed shock and fury into a transformational resolve. Gandhi fell with a railway ticket no one honoured; he rose with a testament none could ignore; he fell a passenger but rose a patriot; fell a barrister but rose a revolutionary; his legal brief became a political cause; his sense of human decency transformed itself into a passion for human justice. The personal died within him that moment and turned public; ‘mine’became ‘thine’.”
    Why am I talking of the South African component of Gandhi’s life and my personal experience of racial discrimination in that country? I am talking because I found it extremely disturbing to read a few of the recent praises of Gandhi and his lessons for Fiji and her leaders, specifically by those who claim to be the Mahatma’s admirers and yet have endorsed the past and recent coups in the country, which indirectly and directly has impinged on the human rights of the people of Fiji, especially their right to vote, and to be governed by a party or parties which they had voted into power in the last general election.
    As we celebrated Gandhi’s 139th birth anniversary on 2 October, those reminding us of the lessons to be learnt from the great freedom fighter failed to tell us that the genesis of his “baptism to mahatmaship” did not lay in his being chucked out of the train (which was a factor) but on his learning on the eve of his departure to India in 1894 that his Indian countrymen in Natal were to lose their right to vote in the Natal legislature – a right which the 2006 coupists and their shameless apologists have treasonously robbed the people of Fiji, with the ring leader Frank Bainimarama telling the world: no charter, no election.
    When Gandhi arrived in South Africa in 1893 to act in a lawsuit between two Indian trading merchants, the Indians comprised three distinct group: indentured Indians who were under contract; free Indians who had completed their period of indentureship, and who elected to remain in South Africa, and passenger or Arab Indians, as they wanted themselves to be called, who came to South Africa at their own cost to supply the needs of the indentured Indians. The “Arabs” enjoyed the same citizenship rights as Whites until was changed, provoking, in fact, Gandhi’s entry into Indian and South African politics. Gandhi remained in South Africa from 1893 to 1914.
    In Gandhi, considered by the Whites as an “Unwelcome Visitor”, the Indians found him both a champion for their cause and their message. In 1894, on the eve of his departure to India, he learned that the Natal Indians were to be deprived of the vote, and decided to remain and try to prevent the disenfranchisement of the Indians. In May 1894, he initiated the formation of the Natal Indian Congress (NIC) and thereafter in his capacity as its general secretary campaigned, petitioned, and protested against racial disabilities imposed on his fellow Indian community. The first foretaste of what later came to become a routine form of protest was an open letter Gandhi wrote to the Natal Advertiser in response to an editorial in that paper which disparaged Indian traders and their supposedly “filthy” lifestyles.
    He failed to win European support or sympathy. But his increasing high public profile as the spokesman of the Indians divided he white community, especially when ten days later he took up the subject of Indian franchise in Natal. One colonial newspaper, The Natal Witness, welcomed his entry into the debate, explaining that, “What we want is a European Gandhi to come forward and put life and movement into the dry bones of our political ideas. It is all the more necessary that we should have something of the kind, when we have an example like the Indian Congress before us.”
    In the Natal legislature the response was mixed. Gandhi was accused of political opportunism. “He is a discredited person,” one representative stated, “among the class which he is seeking to benefit, and beyond that he loses if he failed to fight the battle which he fights, consequently whether he wins or loses, he has everything to gain by fighting”. In 1896, the Natal Legislature passed the Franchise Bill in a slightly amended form, leaving the Indian community disenfranchised. It also obtained Royal Assent on the grounds that the Bill was an internal matter for Natal which had been granted self-government in 1893.
    On 5 June, Gandhi left for India, after an absence of three years, to settle domestic affairs and to bring back his wife and children to Durban. The NIC decided that he should, if possible, acquaint prominent individuals and organisations of the position of Indians in South Africa. In compliance with the request of the Natal Indians, Gandhi published, during his short visit to India, a pamphlet, issued under the caption, “The grievances of British Indians in South Africa – An Appeal to the Indian Public”. The pamphlet, known as the Green Pamphlet, because of the colour of its cover, contained a catalogue of indignities suffered by the Indians in South Africa.
    Besides the Green Pamphlet, which ran into two editions after the first ten thousand copies of the first edition were sold out, Gandhi also gave interviews to Indian newspapers, addressed meetings, and opened up contact with some of the leading Indian nationalists of the time: Gokhale, Mehta and Tilak. On 29 November 1896 he sailed for South Africa with his family. In his parting message he stressed that he would prefer the South African Indians followed the policy of non-violence in their struggle for justice. He also hoped that the Government of India would demonstrate responsibility towards them.
    It was the first time that India had learnt of the grievances of an overseas Indian community. He had also set in motion an agitation on the conditions of Indians in South Africa. While the Indians were still pondering a response, a representative of the Reuters news agency cabled a summary of the Green Pamphlet to the Natal Government. When Gandhi returned to Natal in January 1897, he was nearly lynched to death by a frenzied European mob in the streets of Durban. He was kicked, whipped, stale fish and misses were thrown at him.
    The Natal press declared Gandhi innocent of the charges against him, and condemned the mob. He wrote, “Thus the lynching ultimately proved to be a blessing for me, that is, for the cause. It enhanced the prestige of the Indian community in South Africa and made my work easier”. In India, the attack on Gandhi was severely denounced, and Gokhlae wrote a scathing article in his newspaper, India (June 1897), characterizing the episode as a tale “which no right-minded Englishman ought to read without a feeling of deep shame and indignation”.
    Six months later the Anglo-Boer war broke out, and a temporary truce was declared, with Gandhi now acting as a sergeant-major in the Indian Ambulance Corp, on the side of the British. Although sympathetic to the Boer cause, “a small nation fighting for its very existence”, he felt that as British subjects the Indian South Africans must prove themselves worthy of the part they aspired to play in the life of South Africa.
    After the end of the war, he would resume his fight for voting rights on behalf of the South African Indians.
    TO BE CONTINUED:

    Victor Lal is the co-winner with Russell Hunter of the 2008 Robert Keith-Reid Award for Outstanding Journalism. E-mail: vloxford@gmail.com

  7. Democracy Says:

    and now the Fiji Law Society seems to be getting on board in working with the IG – on Close Up last night another gem of a performance by Anish against the new president DS naidu – Naidu did get cornered and came out as if he didn’t know where he was taking the society, with the law society now gone that side the Media and programmes like Close Up remain our only hope

  8. lollipops Says:

    Talk about pessimists! We get the leaders we deserve, don’t we? The new Fiji Law Society president, Dorsami Naidu received 80% of its membership votes over a pathetic 40votes for Isireli Fa who was seen as a dictator and a bully by many. That’s democracy for you, Democracy!

  9. penshu Says:

    This Naidu chap is a sucker – I thought Justice Pathik felt that Doorsami was not fit to be a lawyer – wasnt he also involved in some rape or molestation case – God help Fiji and the lawyers like him

  10. lollipops Says:

    I hear that Judge Pathik was a beneficiary of the Rabuka’s 1987 coup and is on the side of the remaining ‘corrupt’ judges. My sources tell me that Dorsami had an affair (i.e. 2 consenting adults) which his WIFE discovered and over-dramatised the affair in order to embarrass Dorsami Naidu – Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned and dumped. His political enemies esp. the uneducated labour cronies, saw it as an opportunity and quickly latched on to the bandwagon to bring down their old enemy. I understand Isireli Fa has been taken to Court many a time for REFUSING to pay for his poor employees FNPF (superannuation fund) employer-contribution.

    God help this country indeed.

  11. newsfiji Says:

    Well as for Voreqe…let’s just wait and see what happens…he is certainly not going to live forever…let’s be patient..he will reap what he sows..

  12. Peace Pipe Says:

    So the pig acknowledges that the ig is illegal since he declared that its not about legality or illegality but building a better Fiji. Sounds good but it is done in the wrong, illegal and forceful way. It is not his job anyway to provide a better Fiji as he does not represent anyone.

    It is clear now that he is not willing to give up power even if it hurts the people of Fiji economically. All he is doing is covering up the big mistake he made in committing treason and is now desperate to free himself of it.

  13. Keep The Faith Says:

    And what’s with this new PARAMILITARY initiative by tele-tubby on Stuff NZ this am? Whatchu fraid of fcukwits???

    Check out Telen-ski’s attempt to model the new outfits (http://www.stuff.co.nz/4717712a12.html).

    I think I just threw up in my mouth!!

    Fiji coup plotter creates new police unit

    One of the key players in Fiji’s 2006 military coup has created a new police unit and has had himself photographed in its blue camouflage uniform.

    Supplied photos show the “Ready Action Force” or RAF preparing for civil unrest.

    Commodore Esala Teleni was in a small group of senior officers who aided Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama in overthrowing the democratic government in December 2006.

    The subsequent military regime appointed Teleni as police commissioner to replace an Australian, Andrew Hughes, who tried to stop the coup.

    The Fiji Police website Teleni’s new Force unveiled over the weekend but did not explain why it was necessary.

    A brief statement said nothing of what the unit was for, but photos provided showed darkly uniformed men in flak jackets and helmets. Some were equipped with dogs. They did not appear to be armed.

    It said the RAF would replace a unit known as the Police Mobile Unit which had been set up in 2004 by Hughes. It was not deployed during the 2006 coup.

    Hughes has attempted to have the unit lightly armed but the day before the coup the military took their arms.

    Meanwhile Bainimarama returned to Fiji from the United Nations over the weekend and in a statement said the military government was “fully committed to restoring Parliamentary democracy” but said it could not be achieved with the current electoral system.

    He repeated that his earlier promise to hold elections by March next year would not now take place.

    It would be another year to 15 months before elections could occur.

  14. newsfiji Says:

    Sa sivia na playing God tiko vei ka qori – na qai lewa na tani na veidigidigi…o baku na qai tini ga i Naboro! He..he..

  15. Jone Biutiviti Says:

    The saying, “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”, really applies to the imbecile’s insistence that the work done by the interim regime now is not about legality or illegality but about building the nation. A piece of shit by any other name is a piece of shit. It will take an ill-informed person to believe in the imbecile’s cause. But then there are a lot of ill-informed people out there, it really sickens us. Until we discover the fact that it is more fulfilling to fight for one’s own cause and for what one believes is right rather than fighting for someone elses’ dream even when you know that it is overridden with lies and deceit but just for the sake of pleasing him or her, we will remain a nation of coups filled with lies, deceit, half truths, back stabbers and opportunists. And yet we call ourselves Christians.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: